There's some really interesting sociological hocus pocus behind it, but from what I understand, the TLDR is that if a botter gets permabanned, they'll often just buy a new account and go right back to botting. However, if we only suspend them -- meaning, they'll get their account back later -- they're less likely to buy a new one. Furthermore, once they do get their account back, they're EXTREMELY unlikely to bot again.

　　它背后隐藏着有趣的社会学的戏法，据我所知，如果作弊玩家被永久封停，他们通常会再买一个新账号然后继续开挂作弊。但是，如果我们仅仅是暂时冻结他们 —— 意味着在将来他们的账号还能用 —— 他们就不太愿意再买个新账号。此外，一旦他们的账号解封，他们就极其不愿意再次开挂作弊了。

提示：支持键盘“← →”键翻页 阅读全文

　　我不是心理学专家，但是这种“几个月后又是一条好汉”的想法确实会令大部分人放弃使用外挂，这比永久封停效果好多了。真是个有意思的现象(至少在我看来)。

　　翻译

　　Lore:

　　经过暴雪和其它公司/团队多方面的研究，，我们通过监视玩家行为发现，暂时冻结比永久封停更为有效地阻止玩家再次使用作弊程序。

　　I'm not a psychology expert, but there's something about "I'll get this account back later" that leads more of these sorts of people to give up their botting ways than if their accounts had been permanently closed. It's kind of fascinating (at least I find it to be).

　　Lore:

　　Side note: please avoid referencing bot programs directly by name, you're only making it easier for people to find them!

　　提示：请避免直接指出外挂程序的名字，那样只会使别的玩家更容易认识它。

　　蓝贴原文

　　Through various studies (conducted both here at Blizzard and by other companies/groups), and by monitoring player behavior, we've discovered that suspensions are actually more effective than permabans for preventing repeat offenses by the same people.